A Common Name PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 07 August 2008 01:05

Here is FDN's own "Pick of the Postings" on what may seem a minor issue, but is of great importance to our people and society.


Everybody is talking about "a common name". We at FDN have our
own views on this but we don't have a common view. The views of
our team members differ on this one great question, but they don't
divide into the two obvious categories.

Our ethnic make-up is mixed. One of us is the proud bearer of the
heritages of our two major races! Last night we sat around a bow! or
two and discussed the question for couple of hours.

Like everyone who has lived overseas and faced the question "where
are you from", we get used to being tangled up on the question of
"but are you Fijian"? The simple fact is, and we all agree on this, that
outside of Fiji it doesn't make a whole lot of sense not to be called
Fijian if you are from Fiji.

How many times have we heard the response from people who know
little about Fiji; "so you were born in Fiji but you're not Fijian?" In
Australia it's not so bad because people are often aware of Fiji's
complex ethnic issues and history, but even here you can still get into
weird conversations.

After hours of chewing the issue over in the way you do when you're
around the yaqona bowl we agreed on a few things.

First, it makes sense to have a common name. After three or more
generations in a country to have to explain your ethnic heritage is a
bit silly.

But how do you do that given the sensitivity of many, probably most
Fijians (I trust we don't have to clarify who we mean here) to the
issue of their name. In Fiji, the word Fijian has entered the English
language as the translation of i Taukei. That's a fact that no-one can
change. "Native" might be a better translation but that's not what the
colonial government or Fijians wanted.

FIJI Islander is a way around this but you can imagine the kind of
confusion that could lead to overseas: "so you're an Islander but you
look Indian." We all agreed pretty quickly that Fiji Islander is a dead
end.

Another thing we agreed on is that the question of a common name is
really pretty trivial, at least to us, when you consider all of the
problems we've got, but it is vitally important that any change is made
by a democratically elected government.

The last government that could ever make any change to use of the
name Fijian is one that has forced itself upon the people of Fiji at gun-
point which is at the same time doing all sorts of things to provoke
and antagonize Fijians, by sacking Fijians from civil service and
board positions and making provocative statements about land.

The thing that the quest for a common name needs most desperately
is democracy. Only a democratically elected government can have
the mandate for such a change. The un-elected National Committee
for Bullshit and Bluster wants to give us pure democracy, as they see
it, but why do they want to give us a new name before they have
introduced their pure democracy?

We think we have an answer: it's because the Illegal regime wants to
sow the seeds of anger and distrust in order to prolong their
dictatorial rule. Far from wanting to move Fiji forward they want to
mire Fiji in confusion, anger and distrust. We say return democracy
and the rule of law to Fiji now. Let's move back to the rule of law, not
forward, because if this is the future we don't want it.